A lot of
negative and positive ideas came to my mind when I think about the reasons, and
sometimes, methods, people have or use when they decide to have children. Many
times, an egoistic attitude causes a disadvantage in the child’s life. Other
times, an egoistic attitude has a positive outcome, but for the wrong reasons.
And in some cases, good intentions make everything wrong. But sometimes, good
things happen, not for the sake of the parent, but for the sake of the child. I
will list here what I mean:
Negative
attitudes:
- “Let’s make a baby” sex
Quoting T-online.de here:
Hardly any other moment in a relationship
is as meaningful as the one in which you decide to have a child together. For
years, you have been trying to prevent pregnancy with condoms and pills, and
all of a sudden you are going for the exact opposite. The mutual wish for a
child is also a declaration of love towards one another, because it means that
both partners are ready to commit themselves to each other and that they are
longing for a visible product of this love and a miniature version of that
partner. This is why the “let’s make a baby” sex is incredibly emotional,
intimate and romantic.
My opinion: The article already spoke for
itself in a negative way. Pushing aside all the sentimental rubbish, what’s
really left? A product and a miniature version of my own partner. When I think
of these words, it sounds like things I would be proud of (product - something I produced) or that I would want
for myself (a little toy version of my partner). None of these implicate
anything that would show any kind of awareness that there is actually a new
being involved. A human being that wants to be acknowledged for its own
sake… not to be the new object to make a relationship interesting. Do you also
notice that they talk about commitment towards each other but not the new
family member?
The “Let’s
make a baby” sex is a half-romantic, half-sexual idea that reduces creating a
new life to a sentimental and biological concept. It says nothing about
responsibility.
- “I want a child – no matter what”
I’m sure
everyone knows a woman who has expressed this idea. Some women are so obsessed
over having a child that the idea itself transforms into a static image
associated with feelings. The woman does not see the child as a human being
that is going to grow, change, and become independent. The only image that is
seen is the image of a mother holding her baby – including a lot of pride,
self-fulfillment and “mother godess”-ness. The figure of the mother is in the
highest position here, and the child is only a means to an end. Therefore, the
well-being of the child is not really of any concern, apart from the time when
it is a baby and needs to be taken care of the way the mother wants to take
care of it. No thought is invested into the idea that this baby in need will
also be a toddler in need, a teenager in need, and an adult waiting to move out
of the house (or not). The reasons for this attitude are biological aspects,
the projection of happiness into the object “baby” and the thought that a woman
on her own (with or without a partner) can’t possible become happy.
- “The state/country will support me” or “my partner will support me”
I’m not
sure in how many countries this is the case, but where I live, a pregnant woman
will be protected by the country in financial ways if there is no partner
around. That itself is not a problem, as well as the possibility that the male
partner will financially secure the mother to be. Where it becomes problematic
is when the woman decides to “settle down” in this attitude and become lazy.
As an
employee in the employment market sector, I know all about it. Many women with
big bellies walk in and apply for unemployment benefits – knowing nobody can
force them to work once the pregnancy has reached a certain level. Even years
after the child was born, the mother will still be able to receive benefits
while not being forced to do anything in return. No other person is able to
easily receive benefits like that.
Not only
the attitude towards the country is a problem, because you could argue that the
mother already serves her country by providing a new generation. The real
problem is when the mother just throws away everything in this situation. Many
of these women I am talking about never graduated from school, nor do they have
a job training under their belt (no pun intended). Becoming pregnant and being
left by the male partner is nothing to be blamed for, it can happen and it’s
not a good behaviour from the man’s part. But slipping into a “victim”
constellation by not doing anything to protect oneself, that is stupid.
In the long
run, the child suffers. Not only is the mother permanently crippled by her own
inability to find a job and the fact that she is bound by her child, the child
will always have to live from the state-financed benefits. Clothes won’t be
good enough to compete with class mates. Food won’t be healthy enough. Field
trips will become a financial risk. The disadvantages will be felt along the
way. And who is poor, usually stays poor.
The “my
partner will support me” mindset can backfire, too. If a woman depends totally
on the partner and then that partner runs off, the woman who was too naïve will
be left with a crying baby and no qualification to improve her situation.
- Self-sacrifice attitude
Every
mentally sane mother has some kind of sacrifice instinct, which means she will
sacrifice herself in favour of the child if that is necessary. Sometimes,
though, it goes much too far. There is an irrational type of self-sacrifice. It
is egoistic because it puts one’s desire to improve the child’s situation
before anything else, even if more suffering is created than spared. It sounds
complicated, so I will give you a simple example.
There is an
episode of Dr. House where a pregnant woman has some kind of medical problem.
It is not certain whether the baby will live, but for the sake of the woman,
the birth of the child must be triggered immediately. There is a good chance
that both will survive, but as for the baby, there is no absolute certainty.
The pregnant woman completely rejects this approach and insists that she will
carry the baby in herself for as long as she can. The husband is totally
devastated and can’t believe she is sacrificing her own life, because not
having an operation immediately will cause the woman to die soon. The baby’s
chance of survival increases by only 5 to 10 per cent (or something like that).
Note that the man will have to raise the child alone. Good luck.
- Living your life through your child
Many
parents live with regrets. They are much older and wiser now, so they wish they
could go back and “seize the day” to achieve all the things they never had the
courage, chance or ability to do. This wish is perverted when parents try to
re-live their lives through their children. Suddenly, the child has to become
the musician or race driver that the parents never managed to become. I myself
remember a situation when my dad literally kicked my ass into a go-cart
violently so that I would drive it and become the next Michael Schumacher. From
one second to the next, what was first and offer I was not sure to accept
became an order I was forced to follow. I didn’t enjoy the ride and felt
humiliated and angry.
- Indoctrination
Indoctrination
can ruin a child’s life more than any other attitude listed here. The
indoctrination doesn’t just end when the child has become an adult. Most people
are not able to free themselves from the religious ideas they were taught. Like
a child that was never told that Santa Claus isn’t real, they keep believing
the exact same things their parents taught them.
I am not
totally against religion in general. It’s a personal thing. But you should be
honest: Most parents who are religious don’t give their children a realistic
choice of finding out what they themselves want to believe. What to believe and
what not to believe is basically predetermined from the craddle.
I don’t
mind if people put positive implications into their children’s heads, like the
“love everyone” aspect of christianity or the “desire hurts” aspect of
buddhism, but many times I notice that religion is used to put pressure on
people. Then it’s always about not being good enough, not praying enough, not
following the rules enough, or going to hell. It creates enemies, builds walls
between people, and spreads hate that can affect nations. Indoctrination is
often egoistic, especially when people believe they must pass on religion to
their children in order to make it to heaven. And even if the intentions are
good, you are putting chains on your children if you threaten them with hell
and the judgement of our angry, full-of-rage heavenly Father who is at the same
time so lovely and forgiving.
To see Thee more clearly, to feel Thee
more nearly….
Positive attitudes
- Mental and physical health from day one
I recently
read that the obesity (or lack thereof) of a pregnant mother determines the
number of fat cells a baby will have. And once the fat cells are there, you
can’t change their number.
Vice versa,
caring about the health of a child is one of the least egoistic things you can
do. As a parent, you don’t directly benefit from it. You won’t necessarily see
the health. You won’t be able to live long enough to see how old the child can
get. And it will also not be so convenient protecting your child from all the
sugar and fat that all the other children get from their parents. This little
peace of mind you get in return doesn’t make up for the efforts you have to go
through. But that’s what makes it so good. Finally, you get to do something
that does not feed your ego or bring you an advantage, but the child. There are
enough books about healthy living, and it’s best to start early. Who do you
think is responsible for what happens at the dentist’s?
- Passing on wealth
You could
argue that a “low motive” is present here: The survival of your offspring. Of
course the generation after you has a better chance of survival if you have
some money to give to them before you bite the dust. On the other hand,
spending that money all for yourself would be even more egoistic. Therefore,
passing on wealth is more of a selfless behaviour. Note: Paying for education
is absolutely useful.
- Equality of siblings
There is
always some instinct that tells you to treat this or that child better than the
other child. When there are three children, the eldest and youngest will have
different advantages and disadvantages while the middle one will usually feel
ignored.
It takes a
lot of effort to treat your children equally. But it’s important to be fair.
Otherwise you will raise children who always want to be right, hold a grudge
against society or feel overly privileged. Just be fair. It’s for the sake of
the children.
- Supporting the improvement of abilities
Not just a
musical instrument or a new language, also the basic abilities are important.
Even nowadays, it is still expected of a man to be handy and of a woman to be a
good cook. We can’t kill these expectations, but it doesn’t hurt to prepare
children for all these things. When they are young, they can learn so easily
and with fun. I don’t know why, but my dad never told me that we’re going to
repair something, and I was never good at handiness. I learned a couple of
things, but could have learned a lot more, without having my childhood taken
away from me. Again, it would be so much easier for parents to just sit back
and relax, don’t pay for classes and courses and never show children anything
new… but yeah… get off your ass and do something.
- Making the child a tolerable part of society
It doesn’t
help our society, nor does it help the parents or the child if the child grows
up without any rules, or if the child is dominated into submission with tons of
rules. On both extremes of the spectrum, you see behaviour that the society
will have to carry on its shoulders later. On one end, you see a rebel grown up
that just can’t get used to getting up in the morning and following orders from
his boss, on the other end you see an insecure creature that can’t make his own
decisions. Not only are these products of education a pain in the ass for
everyone who was raised well enough, they also cost us money and we have to
bear with them… knowing we can’t act the same way or we will go back to the stone
age.
You can but
don’t have to put in all the effort, but it certainly helps everyone else.
- Conveying true values
As opposed
to indoctrination, there are some values you can teach a child which will have
a positive effect on the later life of that person. This is not about
threatening or intimidating. It’s about enhancing the value of life. There are
many ways to do this. Teach connectedness with nature, appreciate the goods
that our modern age offers, display gratitude for all the food that is available,
show the child how other people in this world live (Africa). The goal is to
give your child something it can always go back to before it gets too spoilt.
It won’t always have to strive for more and it won’t become so annoyed easily.
Of course, you don’t have to show your child the true meaning of humility, and
you can’t buy anything for it. But just do something non-egoistic once in a
while. Please. If you have kids.